Case 4102121/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Case Number: 4102121/2013 Ms A Lowrie v Glasgow City Council — 2025
- Case reference
- 4102121/2013
- Decision date
- 20 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Case Number: 4102121/2013 Ms A Lowrie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 38(1)(d).
The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn from acting, and a strike out warning letter was sent on 16 January 2025 after the claimant failed to respond to a Tribunal status enquiry asking her to confirm her intention regarding the claim. That correspondence was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address provided on the ET1.
The claimant had not informed the Tribunal of a new address, so the Tribunal could not communicate with her or give notice under rule 38(2). In those circumstances, the Tribunal assumed that she no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The listing category indicates Equal Pay Act. The judgment itself describes only 'the claim' and records that it was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(2) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.