Case 4102121/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v 21st Architecture Ltd (In Administration) c/o A Andreau — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102121/2022
- Decision date
- 19 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short procedural decision in which Ms A M Ritchie’s unfair dismissal complaint against 21st Architecture Limited (In Administration) c/o Andrew Andreau is recorded as having been withdrawn by the claimant. The Legal Officer then dismissed the complaint under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The decision notes that it was made by a Legal Officer, and that either party could apply for the decision to be considered afresh by an Employment Judge within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties. The judgment was dated 18 October 2022 and entered in the register on 19 October 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the unfair dismissal complaint had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.