Case 4102123/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G McLeish v Banner Burnett Hospitality Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102123/2023
- Decision date
- 8 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G McLeish
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr G McLeish worked for Banner Burnett Hospitality Ltd as a sous chef from 14 May 2022 to 11 February 2023 on a zero-hours contract, although he normally worked 37 hours per week. His claim concerned notice pay and holiday pay after he resigned by email on 23 January 2023, stating that his last day would be 11 February. The respondent accepted that shortened notice period. The tribunal recorded that he earned about £555 per week and was paid £15 per hour.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been rostered for the week beginning 30 January 2023, but did not attend those shifts because the ferries were cancelled. It held that he was not entitled to payment for shifts he did not attend. For the week beginning 6 February, the tribunal found that the claimant and Joe Burnett discussed holiday arrangements on 27 January, and that the claimant's response amounted to reluctant acceptance of taking holiday that week. The tribunal also held that, even if there had not been agreement, the respondent was entitled under clause 6.5 of the contract to require him to take holiday on reasonable notice, with reference to regulation 15 of the Working Time Regulations 1998.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant was later paid £1,269.87 gross on 1 March 2023 for "Outstanding holiday 21 - 23". It found that this sum represented the claimant's correct holiday entitlement, including the week beginning 6 February and holiday accrued during his earlier 2021 employment. Although the pay slip grouped together holiday already taken and accrued-but-untaken holiday, the amount paid was correct. The tribunal also noted that any claim for holiday pay from the earlier employment would in any event have been time-barred. It therefore held that the claimant had been paid all the money to which he was entitled and dismissed the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Part of the claimant's dispute about notice pay. The tribunal found he resigned on 23 January 2023, his resignation was accepted, and he was not entitled to payment for shifts he did not attend in the week beginning 30 January 2023 because of ferry cancellations. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay dispute under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The tribunal found the claimant had agreed, or alternatively could lawfully be required, to take holiday in the week beginning 6 February 2023 on reasonable notice under clause 6.5 and regulation 15, and that the later payment of £1,269.87 covered the holiday due. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Regulation 15 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.