Case 4102136/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102136/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on October 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mrs Jacqueline Majella Butler v Campbell Connon, Solicitors & David Morrison & John Fraser Hendry, The Partners thereof — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102136/2023
- Decision date
- 30 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102136/2023 (V) Held at Aberdeen on October 2023 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mrs Jacqueline Majella Butler
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs Jacqueline Butler had worked for Campbell Connon as a legal secretary since 6 September 1993. The tribunal found that the firm had ceased trading after the appointment of a Judicial Factor, and that the effective date of termination of her employment was 2 November 2022, when Morna Grandison wrote to say that Campbell Connon could no longer trade. On that basis, it found a genuine redundancy situation and awarded a statutory redundancy payment.
The tribunal held that the claims for unpaid wages, accrued annual leave and notice pay were out of time on the face of the dates, because the ACAS early conciliation certificate issued on 18 January 2023 but the claim form was not presented until 10 March 2023. It nevertheless found that it had not been reasonably practicable for Mrs Butler to present the claim in time, having regard to her lack of tribunal experience and advice, the distress caused by the dismissal, her mother's death on 17 November 2022, and her attempts to correspond with the Judicial Factor. It therefore accepted jurisdiction to determine those claims.
On the merits, the tribunal found that Mrs Butler had not been paid her October wages and awarded £1,354.85. It also found that she had accrued 12 days' untaken annual leave and awarded £750.36 in lieu of holiday pay. For notice, it found that she was entitled to 12 weeks' statutory notice but had been summarily dismissed, and it awarded £3,381.84 in damages for breach of contract based on her net weekly pay. It also found that she had not been given a written statement of particulars of employment and awarded £625.32, representing the minimum amount of two weeks' pay.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent appeared to be insolvent and that no payments had been made by the Judicial Factor. The total awards made by the tribunal came to £14,397.86.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded after the tribunal found a genuine redundancy situation because Campbell Connon had ceased to trade. | Upheld | — | £8,285 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim under s.23 ERA 1996 for unpaid October wages; award subject to the appropriate deductions for Income Tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,355 |
| Working time regulations | Award for payment in lieu of accrued annual leave under Regulation 30(1)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998; paragraph 17 refers to 'Working Time Regulations 1993', which appears to be a typographical error. Award subject to the appropriate deductions for Income Tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £750 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for failure to give the claimant 12 weeks' notice of termination of employment; calculated by reference to net weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £3,382 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of particulars of employment under s.1 ERA 1996; the tribunal awarded the minimum amount of two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £625 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,398
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- reasonably practicable
- reasonable further period
- minimum amount of two weeks' pay
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.