Case 4102141/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102141/2023 Miss K Hepburn v The Rustic Grill — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102141/2023
- Decision date
- 20 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102141/2023 Miss K Hepburn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal held that Miss Hepburn’s complaint of pregnancy discrimination succeeded. It also held that her complaint of failure to provide written particulars succeeded.
The judgment did not assess remedy at this stage. It records that remedy would be determined at the hearing already listed for 15 May 2023, which was to be converted to a final hearing, held remotely by video, and extended to three hours.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Claim succeeded on the available material under Rule 21; the judgment does not give separate findings beyond that the complaint of pregnancy discrimination succeeds. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Breach of contract | Complaint of failure to provide written particulars succeeded. The judgment does not specify a monetary award because remedy was reserved to a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.