Case 4102173/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Denny Enterprises Int'l Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 4102173/2017
- Decision date
- 27 October 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was listed for a preliminary hearing by telephone on 21 September 2017. The claimant did not contact the tribunal at the allocated time, and the hearing was adjourned in his absence.
The tribunal then gave the claimant until 29 September 2017 to provide written reasons or to request a hearing on whether the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing, so Employment Judge Frances Eccles struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause or causes of action; it states only that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.