Case 4102185/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102185/2022 S McInnes v Ayrshire Garden Services — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102185/2022
- Decision date
- 15 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102185/2022 S McInnes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Frances Eccles issued judgment on the available material under rule 21. The tribunal found that the claimant, S McInnes, had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,252, calculated as 4 weeks at £313.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,670, calculated as 5 years x 1.5 x £356. In addition, the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, and the tribunal ordered payment of £427.20, calculated as 6 days at £71.20. The hearing listed for 1 July 2022 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages for notice pay: 4 weeks at £313. | Upheld | — | £1,252 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment calculated as 5 years x 1.5 x £356. | Upheld | — | £2,670 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded for unpaid holiday entitlement: 6 days at £71.20. | Upheld | — | £427 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,349
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,252
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.