Case 4102189/2022 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Numbers: 4102189/2022 & 4101499/2022 Mrs R Toliusiene v Denholm Seafoods Ltd — 2022

Case reference: 4102189/2022
Decision date: 29 September 2022
Jurisdiction: Scotland

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Numbers: 4102189/2022 & 4101499/2022 Mrs R Toliusiene

Respondent

Denholm Seafoods Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

In proceedings under case numbers 4102189/2022 and 4101499/2022, Mrs R Toliusiene's claim against Denholm Seafoods Ltd was struck out under Rule 37. The tribunal relied on non-compliance with its order of 31 May 2022 and with the note following the preliminary hearing on 3 August 2022, both referred to under Rule 37(1)(c), and on the claim not being actively pursued under Rule 37(1)(d).

The tribunal recorded that reminder emails were sent on 30 August 2022 and 7 September 2022. On 16 September 2022 it gave the claimant until 23 September 2022 to provide written reasons or request a hearing on strike out, but she did not give an acceptable reason or request a hearing. The claim was therefore struck out on 29 September 2022, and no remedy was awarded.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	The judgment struck out the claim under Rule 37 for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 31 May 2022 and the note following the preliminary hearing on 3 August 2022, and because the claim was not actively pursued. The text does not set out the substantive allegations, but the case was listed by the tribunal as race discrimination.	Struck out	Race	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.