Case 4102190/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Mack v SW Global Resourcing Ltd. and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 4102190/2020
- Decision date
- 9 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Cowen
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P Mack
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S Cowen heard the case at Glasgow on 1 December 2021. The tribunal found that Mr P Mack was employed by JSA Services Ltd, the second respondent, for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996 claims and the Equality Act 2010 claims. It also found that SW Global Resourcing Limited, the first respondent, was a "principal" under s.41 Equality Act 2010.
The judgment then dismissed the claims for unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and notice pay as against the first respondent. No monetary award is recorded in the text supplied, and the order does not set out a separate final disposal of those claims against the second respondent in the same judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed as against the first respondent. The tribunal found the claimant was employed by the second respondent for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act 1996 claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Notice pay. Dismissed as against the first respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.41 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.