Case 4102192/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Montgomery v 15 MITM Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102192/2022
- Decision date
- 8 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Montgomery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that by the end of the claimant’s employment on 31 January 2022, his employer was the third respondent, following a transfer from the second respondent on or about 1 December 2021 to which the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 applied. The first, second and third respondents did not attend, and the third respondent filed no response.
It held that the claimant was entitled to a payment in respect of accrued but untaken paid annual leave when his employment ended on 31 January 2022. As no such payment had been made, the tribunal ordered the third respondent to pay £1,257.65 gross to the claimant. Oral reasons were given at the hearing and no request was made for written reasons.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant was entitled to payment for accrued but untaken paid annual leave on termination of employment, and ordered the third respondent to pay £1,257.65 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,258 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,258
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.