Case 4102202/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102202/2022 Mrs S Harrower v Giacomo Wynd Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102202/2022
- Decision date
- 8 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102202/2022 Mrs S Harrower
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the papers because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge Ian McPherson issued judgment on the available material and cancelled the listed hearing on 4 July 2022.
The tribunal found that Mrs S Harrower was dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, it held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,847.50, calculated as 18 weeks' pay at £213.75 per week.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £427.50, being two weeks' pay at the same weekly rate of £213.75. No other remedies were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment calculated at 18 weeks' pay at £213.75 per week. | Upheld | — | £3,848 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of two weeks' pay at £213.75 per week. | Upheld | — | £428 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,275
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.