Case 4102217/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102217/2014 Mr M Cunningham v Turners (Soham) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4102217/2014
- Decision date
- 11 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102217/2014 Mr M Cunningham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 May 2021 Employment Judge Robert Gall struck out the claimant's case under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued within the meaning of rule 37(1)(d). The judgment states that the claimant was Mr M Cunningham and the respondent was Turners (Soham) Limited.
The tribunal had given the claimant until 05 May 2021 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out, or to request a hearing to consider that issue. The claimant did not provide acceptable reasons and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause of action in the text provided. The case is listed under Working Time Regulations on gov.uk, but the judgment itself only records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.