Case 4102226/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102226/2014 Mr M Love v Turners (Soham) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4102226/2014
- Decision date
- 30 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102226/2014 Mr M Love
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 30 September 2021 Employment Judge Robert Gall struck out Mr M Love's claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment records that on 14 September 2021 the tribunal gave the claimant until 28 September 2021 either to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing on that question.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason for the claim to continue and did not request a hearing. In those circumstances, the tribunal struck out the claim. No monetary award or other remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment refers only to 'the claim'; the claim type is taken from the case context/listing category supplied with the extract. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.