Case 4102227/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Jennifer McCallum v Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102227/2023
- Decision date
- 13 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Jennifer McCallum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed by the respondent from 2015 and moved into a kitchen manager role in July 2022 at £450 gross per week. The Tribunal found that she was not engaged on a fixed-term contract and that there had been no break in her continuous employment when she had previously been absent through sickness.
The respondent argued that the claimant's employment ended because a fixed term had expired, while the claimant believed she was penalised for attending university. The Tribunal accepted neither explanation. It found that the kitchen manager role was not financially viable because guest supper demand was insufficient, but the respondent had not advanced redundancy or business reorganisation as the reason and had not given notice of potential redundancy, consulted with the claimant, or considered alternatives in December 2022.
The Tribunal concluded that the dismissal was unfair. It limited compensatory loss to the period ending 31 March 2023 because the claimant obtained alternative work, had not evidenced wider job-search efforts, and had declined a later offer of work from the respondent at £150 per week. It also found that the claimant had not received written particulars of employment or written notice of variations, and awarded the higher four-week amount for that breach.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal found the dismissal unfair and awarded a basic award of £2,925 and compensatory award of £6,004.15. | Upheld | — | £8,929 |
| Other | The respondent was found in breach of its duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars under section 1 ERA 1996, with compensation awarded under section 38 Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,729
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,925
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,004
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.