Case 4102231/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102231/2014 Mr P Thetford v Turners (Soham) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4102231/2014
- Decision date
- 24 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102231/2014 Mr P Thetford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. It recorded that correspondence sent to the claimant at the address given had been returned marked "gone away" and that no new address had been provided.
The tribunal also noted that the claimant’s previous agents had withdrawn from acting and did not hold any address for him other than the one in the claim form. In those circumstances, Employment Judge Robert Gall concluded that the claim was not being actively pursued and ordered that it be struck out. The judgment is dated 23 March 2021 and was sent to the parties on 24 March 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because the claim had not been actively pursued; the judgment does not identify a merits outcome for any substantive claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.