Case 4102237/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102237/2020 Ms A Travers v EBS Systems Limited (In administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102237/2020
- Decision date
- 8 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102237/2020 Ms A Travers
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge Walker issued judgment on the available material under rule 21. The respondent was in administration, and the administrator had consented to the protective award claim proceeding.
The Tribunal declared that the respondent had failed to comply with its obligations under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award in favour of the claimant under section 189. The protected period was 90 days starting on 27 February 2020.
The judgment also recorded that the remaining complaints had been withdrawn by the claimant and were dismissed under rule 52.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under sections 188, 188A and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The remaining complaints were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under rule 52. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
- rule 52 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.