Case 4102246/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Ramage v MITM Greenock Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 4102246/2023
- Decision date
- 11 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Ramage
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Ms F Ramage's claim against MITM Greenock Ltd under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the respondent company had been dissolved and that the claimant had not applied to have it restored to the Register of Companies.
The tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 8 February 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out. It found that the claimant failed to give an acceptable reason. In light of that failure, the tribunal concluded that the claim should be struck out. No merits decision or monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text. The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.