Case 4102247/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Czerniak v McPhee Logistics Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102247/2020
- Decision date
- 16 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Susan Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Czerniak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment in the absence of any response from McPhee Logistics Ltd. On the available material, Employment Judge Susan Walker found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £770. The judgment also recorded an entitlement to payment for accrued but untaken annual leave, with £720 awarded for that head of claim.
The tribunal further found breach of contract in three respects: failing to give notice or pay in lieu of notice, failing to pay expenses, and retaining a deposit paid by the claimant. Damages of £350, £90 and £500 were ordered respectively. The total sum awarded was £2,430. The judgment does not record any other remedies, interest, or separate legal test beyond the rule 21 procedure.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £770 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £720 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £350 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £90 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,430
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.