Case 4102262/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4102262/2020 Preliminary Hearing Held in Chambers on April 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Dr Claire McGonagle v Represented by Ms S Shiels Solicitor Argyll and Bute Integration Joint Board and 4 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 4102262/2020
- Decision date
- 11 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alan Strain
- Venue
- Chambers
Parties
6 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)5 Case No: 4102262/2020 Preliminary Hearing Held in Chambers on April 2021 Employment Judge - A Strain Dr Claire McGonagle
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 27 April 2021, Employment Judge Alan Strain considered whether allegations in the claimant's further and better particulars under the NHS Recruitment (Protected Disclosure) Regulations 2018 were new claims against the Third to Fifth Respondents, or instead formed part of the existing case against the Second Respondent. The Respondents argued that the Regulations did not create personal liability for individual workers and that any such allegations required amendment. The Claimant argued that the ET1 already pleaded a Regulation 9 vicarious liability claim against the Second Respondent and that the further particulars merely expanded that case.
The tribunal accepted that all parties agreed the Regulations do not provide for personal liability of individuals such as the Third to Fifth Respondents. It held that the ET1 gave fair notice of a claim against the Second Respondent on a vicarious liability basis, and that the further and better particulars did not introduce new claims under the Regulations against the Third to Fifth Respondents. Because no claims were brought against those individuals under the Regulations, the alternative question whether such claims had no reasonable prospects of success was irrelevant. The judgment was entered on 11 May 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Preliminary hearing ruling on pleadings only. The tribunal held that the allegations under the NHS Recruitment (Protected Disclosure) Regulations 2018 in the further and better particulars formed part of the existing Regulation 9/vicarious liability claim against the Second Respondent, and did not amount to new individual claims against the Third to Fifth Respondents. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.