Case 4102268/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Neill v Represented by: Mr W McParland - Solicitor J E Sheeran Amusements Arcades Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102268/2018
- Decision date
- 16 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emma Bell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms I Neill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment on preliminary disability issues in Ms I Neill v J E Sheeran Amusements Arcades Ltd. Employment Judge Emma Bell found that Ms Neill was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 on the relevant date, which was the date of dismissal on 9 November 2017.
The tribunal also found that the respondent knew that Ms Neill had a disability, identified in the judgment as Crohn's disease, at the relevant date. The text supplied does not record a final outcome on the underlying discrimination claim or any remedy award; it only records these preliminary findings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records a preliminary finding only: the claimant was disabled within section 6 Equality Act 2010 on the relevant date, and the respondent knew of that disability. It does not record a final liability or remedy outcome for the underlying discrimination claim. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.