Case 4102280/2012 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102280/2012 Mr R Lean v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitors The City of Edinburgh Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102280/2012
- Decision date
- 5 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102280/2012 Mr R Lean
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr R Lean brought a claim against The City of Edinburgh Council. The claimant was represented by Thompsons Solicitors and the respondent by Amy Hood, solicitor.
The tribunal did not adjudicate the merits. It recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The GOV.UK listing category indicates Equal Pay Act. The judgment itself only states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52, without setting out the substantive claim details. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.