Case 4102281/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102281/2020 Miss L Doyle v (1) Philosophi Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102281/2020
- Decision date
- 30 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102281/2020 Miss L Doyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge David Hoey issued judgment under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 on the available material. The tribunal found that Miss L Doyle was dismissed by reason of redundancy.
On that basis, the tribunal held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,787, calculated as £302.96 multiplied by 12.5 weeks. No other remedy or claim outcome is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal, acting under rule 21 on the available material because no response had been presented, found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,787, calculated as £302.96 x 12.5 weeks. | Upheld | — | £3,787 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,787
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.