Case 4102281/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102281/2022 Mr G Cucinotta v Erpingham House Limited (in Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102281/2022
- Decision date
- 5 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102281/2022 Mr G Cucinotta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented by the respondent, Erpingham House Limited (in Liquidation). On the available material, Employment Judge L Wiseman decided that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr G Cucinotta’s wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £427.14, which the judgment describes as one month’s salary. The listed hearing on 7 July 2022 was cancelled. No separate findings were recorded on breach of contract or working time claims, and no split remedy was set out beyond the wage deduction sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 default judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £427.14, described in the judgment as one month’s salary. | Upheld | — | £427 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £427
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.