Case 4102285/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Lister v Floricana Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102285/2020
- Decision date
- 7 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S. Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Lister
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response. Mr Lister gave evidence under affirmation. The tribunal found that his employment had transferred from Nuparc Limited to Floricana Ltd around 8 August 2017 under TUPE. It accepted that he was paid £4,166 gross per month, £3,008 net per month, a monthly car allowance of £400.15, and that the respondent had agreed to pay 2.5% of gross salary into his personal pension instead of joining its pension scheme.
The tribunal found that on 9 March 2020 Mr Lister was told by the respondent's financial controller that his position was redundant. It also found that he did not receive notice of termination, that his access to company email stopped in early April 2020, and that on 21 April 2020 he was told he could only get a P45 if he handed in his notice, would not be paid, and would not be furloughed. From those actions the tribunal inferred that the contract had ended by the respondent's conduct around 21 April 2020 and that the reason was redundancy.
The redundancy pay claim succeeded. On the findings made, Mr Lister was 30 years old and had 6 years' service, so he was entitled to 6 weeks' pay subject to the statutory cap of £538 per week. That produced a redundancy payment of £4,166. The claim for unlawful deductions from wages also succeeded, with an award of £8,121. The reasons state that the claimant had not been paid wages for January, February and March 2020, although the calculation given was based on February, March and 21 days of April 2020.
The tribunal also upheld breach of contract claims for notice pay, pension contributions and car allowance. It awarded £5,768.28 for failure to give notice, £3,093.26 for failure to make pension contributions from November 2017 onwards, and £1,080 for failure to pay car allowance for February, March and April 2020. The claim for payment for accrued but untaken annual leave was withdrawn and dismissed under rule 52. No bonus claim was pursued.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and, being 30 years old with 6 years' service, was entitled to 6 weeks' redundancy pay capped at £538 per week. | Upheld | — | £4,166 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reasons record unpaid wages for January, February and March 2020, but the calculation at paragraph 22 awards February, March and 21 days of April 2020, totalling £8,121. | Upheld | — | £8,121 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for failure to give notice (£5,768.28), unpaid pension contributions from November 2017 to April 2020 (£3,093.26), and unpaid car allowance for February, March and pro rata April 2020 (£1,080). | Upheld | — | £9,942 |
| Holiday pay | The claim for accrued but untaken annual leave was withdrawn and dismissed under rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,229
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.135 ERA
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.86 ERA 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994
- Somerset County Council v Chambers UKEAT/0417/12/KN
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.