Case 4102286/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Marchbank v Brake Brothers — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102286/2020
- Decision date
- 17 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Susan Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Marchbank
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment, issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge Susan Walker found that Mrs C Marchbank had been unfairly dismissed by Brake Brothers.
The tribunal ordered reinstatement to the role of account executive, to take effect no later than 30 September 2020. It also directed that the claimant be treated in all respects, including entitlement to holidays and bonus, as if she had not been dismissed.
The respondent was ordered to pay arrears of pay from the date of dismissal, 5 April 2020, to the date reinstatement took effect. The tribunal also ordered restoration to the respondent’s pension scheme and required the respondent to pay any employer contributions necessary to put the claimant in the position she would have been in had she not been dismissed, subject to any employee contributions she would have made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment on the available material; the tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered reinstatement and associated employment restoration remedies, but the extracted text does not quantify a monetary award. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.