Case 4102302/2018 · Employment Tribunal
R Gall Mr J Huk v Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2018
- Case reference
- 4102302/2018
- Decision date
- 24 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
R Gall Mr J Huk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case called for hearing in Glasgow on 19 April 2018. The tribunal recorded that there was a reasonable amount of agreement between the parties, and discussion took place about which elements were agreed, which were disputed, and the nature of the dispute.
After an adjournment for the parties to consider their positions, they confirmed that they had reached agreement. The respondent agreed to pay the claimant £1,500 in settlement of all claims brought in the case, by instalments of at least £750 by 30 April 2018 and the balance by 31 May 2018.
The tribunal issued judgment reflecting that agreement, recording that both parties were content for judgment to be issued on those terms.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records agreement in settlement of all claims but does not identify individual heads of claim; classification follows the listing category. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records agreement in settlement of all claims but does not identify individual heads of claim; classification follows the listing category. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records agreement in settlement of all claims but does not identify individual heads of claim; classification follows the listing category. | Settled | — | — |
| Other | The listing refers to a written pay statement matter, but the judgment records only a global settlement of all claims and gives no separate detail. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.