Case 4102313/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102313/2018 Mr W Gilmour v Invincible Fire & Security — 2018
- Case reference
- 4102313/2018
- Decision date
- 23 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102313/2018 Mr W Gilmour
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The Employment Judge found that Invincible Fire & Security had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay £1,160. The reasons section records the claimant's calculation by reference to short pay from the first payslip, wages and unpaid overtime, and also refers to a worked figure of £1,160.14.
The tribunal further found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded £461 as payment in lieu of notice. The judgment also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £461 for five days' holiday pay. The hearing listed for 11 May 2018 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment ordered payment of £1,160 for unauthorised deductions from wages. The reasons section sets out the claimant's figures for short pay, wages and unpaid overtime, and also contains a worked figure of £1,160.14. | Upheld | — | £1,160 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £461 as payment in lieu of notice. | Upheld | — | £461 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £461 for five days' holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £461 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,082
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.