Case 4102337/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Burke v Sky Subscribers Services Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102337/2018
- Decision date
- 27 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Burke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerns a preliminary hearing on the claimant's application, made on 4 December 2019, to amend his existing claim. The tribunal recorded that the substantive claim already before it was one of constructive unfair dismissal, with a further claim of unlawful deduction from wages also remaining in the case.
The claimant sought to amend his case to contend that he had been entitled to resign because of a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. The tribunal refused that application. Applying the Selkent factors, the judge found a fundamental difficulty in the proposed amendment because the matters said to show breach were only discovered well after the claimant had resigned and after the claim had been presented, so they could not have caused the resignation.
The tribunal also took account of timing and prejudice. The hearing was close, preparation had proceeded on the basis of the case as previously pled, and allowing the amendment would likely require further answers, witnesses, documents and postponement of the hearing. After refusing the amendment, the tribunal noted a case management issue requiring the claimant to clarify the basis of the unlawful deduction from wages claim before the substantive hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | This judgment does not determine the substantive constructive dismissal claim. It refuses an application to amend that claim to add reliance on breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records a case management discussion seeking clarification of the unlawful deduction from wages claim, but does not determine its merits. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Selkent Bus Company v Moore 1996 IRLR 661
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.