Case 4102348/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102348/2014 The Executor of v Mr R Robertson South Lanarkshire Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 4102348/2014
- Decision date
- 22 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102348/2014 The Executor of
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 4 March 2024, the Tribunal gave the claimant’s executor an opportunity to provide written reasons by 20 March 2024, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The Tribunal recorded that the executor did not contact the Tribunal with any reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing.
In those circumstances, the Tribunal concluded that it had to strike out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment states that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. The underlying claim type is taken from the case listing as equal pay; the judgment itself does not restate the substantive claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.