Case 4102369/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Zaman v Yasmin's Finest Indian Cuisine — 2017
- Case reference
- 4102369/2017
- Decision date
- 13 September 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Zaman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21. The claimant, Mr M Zaman, succeeded on the claim that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal ordered payment of £576, calculated by reference to 80 hours at £7.20 per hour.
The claimant also succeeded on the claim for unpaid holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered payment of £572.40, calculated by reference to 79 hours and 33 minutes at £7.20 per hour.
The hearing listed for 20 October 2017 was cancelled. No separate injury to feelings, interest, or other remedy was recorded in the judgment, and the total payable on the face of the decision was £1,148.40.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment with no response presented; the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £576, calculated on 80 hours at £7.20 per hour. | Upheld | — | £576 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment with no response presented; the tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £572.40, based on 79 hours and 33 minutes at £7.20 per hour. | Upheld | — | £572 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,148
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.