Case 4102371/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102371/2019 Mr E Grady v Glasgow City Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102371/2019
- Decision date
- 16 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102371/2019 Mr E Grady
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, and a letter sent on 24 May 2023 seeking confirmation of the claimant's intentions was returned to the Tribunal Office because the claimant no longer lived at the ET1 address.
The claimant had not provided a new address, so the tribunal could not communicate with him or give notice under rule 37(2). In those circumstances, the tribunal assumed he no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out under rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim for not being actively pursued but does not identify the substantive cause of action in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(2) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.