Case 4102453/2013 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102453/2013 Miss J Picken v Represented by: Thompsons Solicitors North Lanarkshire Council — 2017
- Case reference
- 4102453/2013
- Decision date
- 11 May 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102453/2013 Miss J Picken
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Miss J Picken's claim against North Lanarkshire Council had been withdrawn by the claimant. Following that withdrawal, the Employment Tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability or remedy are recorded in the judgment. The judgment does not identify any monetary award or remedy, and it does not set out the underlying factual allegations or legal issues beyond the dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The supplied judgment text does not set out the substantive equal pay issues. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.