Case 4102473/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Member J McCullagh Tribunal Member A Matheson Ms K Lowe v Represented by: Mr C Jackson Solicitor Shop & Save Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102473/2019
- Decision date
- 27 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp Tribunal
- Venue
- Dundee
- Panel members
- J McCullagh, A Matheson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Member J McCullagh Tribunal Member A Matheson Ms K Lowe
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Kelly Lowe worked for Shop & Save Limited from 18 December 2013 as a shop assistant. The tribunal found that she was dismissed on 22 December 2018, with the dismissal evidenced by the WhatsApp exchanges in which Mr Anees said the business did not have to accept her fit note and did not need her if she did not return, together with the P45 issued later stating a termination date of 24 December 2018 and the claimant's unanswered letter of 21 December 2018. The judgment records that no Equality Act 2010 claim was pursued.
The tribunal accepted that Mr Anees genuinely believed he was entitled to reject the GP fit note and to treat the claimant's refusal to return as gross misconduct, so the reason for dismissal was conduct and was potentially fair. It nevertheless held the dismissal to be unfair because the claimant had a GP fit note supported by stress at work and pregnancy, Mr Anees was not medically qualified, no occupational health or other qualified advice was obtained, no proper investigation or disciplinary hearing was held, and the respondent failed to follow the ACAS Code of Practice. The tribunal also rejected contributory fault and did not accept that any offer of reinstatement had been proved.
On remedy, the tribunal accepted a basic award of £1,055 and assessed compensatory loss at £6,462.82. That figure included four weeks' sick pay, 15 weeks' lost net earnings and employer pension contributions, statutory maternity pay, and £500 for loss of statutory rights. The tribunal then added a £500 uplift under the ACAS Code provisions, producing a total award of £8,017.82. The recoupment section recorded a monetary award of £8,017.82 and a prescribed element of £5,962.82, but the date to which the prescribed element relates is stated inconsistently elsewhere in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Single claim only; the claimant pursued unfair dismissal and the judgment records that no Equality Act 2010 claim was pursued. The total award was £8,017.82, made up of a £1,055 basic award, £6,462.82 compensatory loss, and a £500 ACAS uplift. The recoupment section contains a discrepancy on the date to which the prescribed element relates: the decretal part states 6 September 2019, while paragraph 65 states 10 September 2019. | Upheld | — | £8,018 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,018
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,055
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £6,463
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.95(1) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- Burchell test
- Iceland Frozen Foods band of reasonable responses
- Polkey deduction
- s.207A TULR(C)A 1992 / ACAS Code of Practice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.