Case 4102484/2015 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102484/2015 Mr J Gaffney v Collotype Labels Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 4102484/2015
- Decision date
- 21 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102484/2015 Mr J Gaffney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 21 April 2021 Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman struck out Mr J Gaffney's claim against Collotype Labels Limited under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The tribunal relied on rule 37(1)(d), namely that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The reasons state that on 18 March 2021 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 1 April 2021, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
Because no satisfactory explanation was received, the tribunal decided to strike out the claim. No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive type of claim in the extracted text. It states that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.