Case 4102537/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Cairney v Unrepresented East Dunbartonshire Council — 2018
- Case reference
- 4102537/2016
- Decision date
- 11 June 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Cairney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 11 June 2018 Employment Judge Frances Eccles struck out Mrs E Cairney's claim against East Dunbartonshire Council under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 23 May 2018 it had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 30 May 2018, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
As a result, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim; it records only a strike-out under rule 37(1)(d) for failure actively to pursue the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.