Case 4102555/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Marshall v The Glasgow Housing Association Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102555/2015
- Decision date
- 17 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Marshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the claim on its merits. Instead, it considered case management under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 and concluded that the claim should be struck out because it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
On 27 September 2019, the tribunal gave Mr F Marshall an opportunity to provide written reasons by 11 October 2019, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal recorded that he failed to give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing.
The judgment therefore strikes out the claim. No liability findings and no monetary remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Struck out under rule 37 on the ground that the claim had not been actively pursued, in terms of rule 37(1)(d). The tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity on 27 September 2019 to provide written reasons by 11 October 2019 or request a hearing, but no acceptable reason or request was received. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.