Case 4102569/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms I Olczak New Whites (Leith) Ltd v New Whites (Leith) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102569/2023
- Decision date
- 16 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms I Olczak New Whites (Leith) Ltd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant lodged her claim on 31 March 2023 complaining of unlawful deduction from wages in respect of Statutory Sick Pay and holiday pay. A final hearing was held on 15 August 2023 before Employment Judge A Jones. The claimant did not attend, and the tribunal recorded unsuccessful attempts by the clerk to contact her by email and telephone before the hearing. An interpreter was available for her, but she did not appear at the allocated time.
Mr Singh appeared for the respondent. The respondent's position was that no sums were due, although there had been some confusion about whether holiday pay was payable. The respondent also said the claimant had not been dismissed by them. The claimant had not applied to postpone the hearing and had not given any indication that she would be unavailable.
The tribunal noted that it had limited jurisdiction in determining whether a failure to pay Statutory Sick Pay amounts to an unlawful deduction from wages. In any event, because the claimant was absent and there was no evidence from her about any deductions said to have been made, the tribunal was satisfied that the claim should be dismissed. The judgment therefore records that the claimant's claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim was presented as an unlawful deduction from wages complaint in respect of Statutory Sick Pay and holiday pay. The tribunal noted it had limited jurisdiction in relation to whether a failure to pay Statutory Sick Pay amounts to an unlawful deduction from wages, and dismissed the claim in the claimant's absence and for lack of evidence. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.