Case 4102582/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102582/2020 Mr I Kearney v James McMillan t/a Riverwood Design and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102582/2020
- Decision date
- 31 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102582/2020 Mr I Kearney
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material. The judgment records that the claimant, Mr I Kearney, was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered the respondent, James McMillan t/a Riverwood Design, to pay damages for that breach in the sum of £3,114.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,690. No other claims, reasoning, or adjustments to remedy are recorded in the extracted judgment. The bottom-line monetary total from the two awards is £6,804.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The extracted text shows the amount as '£3,1 14'; this is treated as £3,114 from the context of the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,114 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,690 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,804
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.