Case 4102583/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102583/2019 Mr D McDonald v Land and Building Services Limited (in Administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102583/2019
- Decision date
- 17 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102583/2019 Mr D McDonald
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman decided that the claimant, Mr D McDonald, had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered the respondent, Land and Building Services Limited (in Administration), to pay damages of £1,940.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,725. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to comply with its obligations under section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
For that failure, the tribunal made a protective award and ordered payment for the protected period from 29 January 2019 to 29 April 2019, described in the judgment as a period of 90 days. The extracted text does not state a separate monetary figure for the protective award, so only the finding and protected period are recorded here.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,940. | Upheld | — | £1,940 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,725. | Upheld | — | £4,725 |
| Trade union | The tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award for the protected period of 29 January 2019 to 29 April 2019, described as a period of 90 days. No monetary amount for the protective award is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.