Case 4102593/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Smith v The Glasgow Housing Association Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102593/2015
- Decision date
- 17 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment records that the tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity on 27 September 2019 to provide written reasons by 11 October 2019, or to request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason for the claim to continue and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Wiseman concluded that the claim should be struck out. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not identify the substantive underlying working time complaint beyond the case listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.