Case 4102597/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Donnachie v Represented by, Mr M Hemsi, Solicitor Greater Glasgow Health Board — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102597/2023
- Decision date
- 14 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Donnell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Donnachie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Donnachie, a community living disability charge nurse with 32 years’ service, was dismissed by Greater Glasgow Health Board after complaints from Living Ambitions staff about his conduct towards a service user referred to as Patient A. The allegations included entering A’s bed while A was asleep, using footballs to enlarge A’s breast area, restricting A’s movement, touching A in ways said to be unwelcome, and asking a staff member to marry him. The tribunal recorded that the respondent treated the allegations as a conduct matter, carried out an investigation, and then held a disciplinary hearing before Colin McCormack, who dismissed the claimant in November 2022; the appeal was heard by Suzanne Miller and was not upheld in June 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- British Home Stores Ltd v Burchell
- Sainsbury's Supermarket v Hitt
- Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary Practices and Procedures
- band of reasonable responses
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.