Case 4102598/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102598/2023 Miss L Watt v Carlton Bar — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102598/2023
- Decision date
- 1 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4102598/2023 Miss L Watt
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 20 June 2023, Miss L Watt told the Tribunal that she had privately settled with Carlton Bar and asked for the hearing to be cancelled. The Tribunal then wrote to her on 10 July 2023 asking whether the settlement had been implemented and whether she was now in a position to withdraw her claim.
No reply was received. A strike-out warning letter was issued on 20 July 2023 giving the claimant until 28 July 2023 to respond, but she did not do so or ask for a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action beyond referring to 'the claim'. The case listing context indicates unlawful deduction from wages and working time, but that is not stated in the judgment text itself. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.