Case 4102599/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 4102599/2025
- Decision date
- 22 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Phillips
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy consent under rule 62 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, the parties agreed that Mr Husnain Mansoor was employed by Arria Data2Text Limited at all material times. The Tribunal substituted Arria Data2Text Limited as respondent and removed Arria NGL UK Limited because the proceedings had wrongly been issued against that company.
The judgment records that Arria Data2Text Limited made unauthorised deductions by failing to pay the claimant's full wages due from May 2024 to August 2025 inclusive and ordered payment of £48,125.10 gross, calculated as 15 payments of £3,208.34. It also records that, at termination, the respondent had made no employer pension contributions, in breach of contract, and awarded £2,406.30 gross in damages, calculated as 5% of £3,208.34 for 15 months. The two orders total £50,531.40; the respondent may make legally required Income Tax and employee National Insurance deductions from the wages award subject to remitting them to HMRC and providing written evidence to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Consent judgment under rule 62 following the parties' oral agreement. The award is a gross sum, subject to any Income Tax and employee National Insurance deductions required by law. | Upheld | — | £48,125 |
| Breach of contract | Consent judgment under rule 62 following the parties' oral agreement. Damages were awarded for the respondent's failure to make employer pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £2,406 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £50,531
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.