Case 4102601/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: Mr C Fletcher 4102601/2023 v John O'Groats Leisure Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4102601/2023
- Decision date
- 10 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: Mr C Fletcher 4102601/2023
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr C Fletcher’s claim against John O'Groats Leisure Ltd under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 2013 because the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not determine the merits of any substantive complaint.
The reasons record that, on 2 June 2023, the claimant was asked for comments on the respondent’s request for postponement, but no suitable reply was received. By letter dated 21 June 2023, the respondent’s representative asked for the claim to be struck out for non-pursuit, and a strike-out warning letter was issued on 27 June 2023 giving the claimant until 4 July 2023 to respond.
The tribunal noted that the claimant failed to respond, did not give reasons why judgment should not be made, and did not request a hearing. In those circumstances, the tribunal decided to strike out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify separate substantive heads of claim. It records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.