Case 4102603/2022 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102603/2022 Mr P Thomson v Onsite Property Management Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4102603/2022
- Decision date
- 25 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102603/2022 Mr P Thomson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material after no response was presented by the respondent. The Employment Judge found that Onsite Property Management Ltd had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and made an unauthorised deduction from his wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,228.13 gross for holiday entitlement and £2,884.60 gross for the unlawful deduction from wages. The total award was therefore £4,112.73 gross.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant lacked sufficient qualifying service. No discrimination issues were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,228.13 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,228 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,884.60 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,885 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant lacked sufficient qualifying service. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,113
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.