Case 4102611/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Bruce v And others set out in the attached schedule Dovetail Enterprises (1993) Limited (In Administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 4102611/2025
- Decision date
- 28 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Bruce
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 22 judgment on the available material and recorded that the respondent, Dovetail Enterprises (1993) Limited (In Administration), did not contest the claims. The claimants were employees dismissed as redundant at the respondent’s Dundee site, and the joint administrators consented to the claims proceeding so that the claimants could seek a protective award.
The tribunal found that the respondent dismissed 20 or more employees at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less, with dismissals taking place between 28 and 31 March 2025. It further found that the respondent failed to ensure that employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A and then failed to consult with them in accordance with section 188.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the complaint of failure to comply with section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded and made a protective award in respect of the claimants. The protected period was 90 days beginning on 28 March 2025, and the respondent was ordered to pay remuneration for that protected period. The extracted text does not state any monetary figure for the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to consult on collective redundancies and to ensure election of employee representatives. No monetary sum is stated in the extracted judgment text; the tribunal ordered remuneration for the protected period. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- section 188 TULRCA 1992
- section 188A TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.