Case 4102619/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jonny Bates v James Davies (Scotland) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102619/2019
- Decision date
- 23 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jonny Bates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Bates worked for James Davies (Scotland) Ltd as a driver from 3 December 2018 to 11 February 2019, paid at £10 per hour for the first 40 hours each week and £13 per hour thereafter. The Tribunal found that he was not given a compliant written statement of particulars during his employment. It accepted the claimant's text-message chronology, including that he said he was resigning but was willing to work the rest of the week as notice.
On that evidence, the Tribunal preferred the claimant's account over the respondent's and found that the respondent's reply, including the instruction to 'return your PPE and just finish', brought the employment to an end immediately. It therefore treated the claimant as having been dismissed with immediate effect and awarded the balance of notice pay at £320 gross. It also awarded accrued holiday pay for 1.5 days; the operative judgment states £140 gross, although paragraph 24 of the reasons refers to £120 gross for the same entitlement.
The overtime claim failed because the claimant had not followed the respondent's procedure for recording and claiming overtime hours and had not established that he was entitled to the additional payment claimed. The Tribunal then applied section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 because the employer had not provided a compliant section 1 ERA 1996 statement within the required period. It increased the award by the minimum two weeks' pay, £800 gross, taking into account the respondent's size, the absence of a deliberate omission, the short length of employment, and the fact that the claimant had not asked for and been refused a statement.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent's text telling the claimant to 'return your PPE ... and just finish' amounted to dismissal with immediate effect, after the claimant had said he was willing to work the rest of the week. | Upheld | — | £320 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant said he was owed 1.5 hours' overtime, but he accepted he had not followed the proper procedure of texting the respondent the hours worked, and the tribunal found entitlement was not established. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The operative judgment states accrued holiday pay of 1.5 days at £140 gross, but paragraph 24 of the reasons calculates the same entitlement as £120 gross. The ordered figure appears in the judgment heading and is used here. | Upheld | — | £140 |
| Other | This was the statutory uplift under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a compliant section 1 ERA 1996 written statement of particulars. The respondent later sent what the tribunal treated as a job advert, which was not sufficient. | Upheld | — | £800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,260
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.