Case 4102636/2018 · Employment Tribunal
L Doherty Mr Steven Anderson & Others v (As per attached Schedule) Represented by:- Ms P Cunningham – Solicitor VG Energy Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4102636/2018
- Decision date
- 18 April 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
Parties
2 namedClaimant
L Doherty Mr Steven Anderson & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal (Scotland) made a Rule 21 judgment in favour of the claimants in claims brought by Mr Steven Anderson and others against VG Energy Limited. It found that the respondents had failed to comply with their duty to consult under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
As a result, the tribunal ordered the respondents to pay the claimants a protective award under section 189(2) TULRCA. The judgment records that the protected period begins on 24 October 2017 and lasts for 90 days.
The extracted text does not state the amount of the protective award or any further monetary breakdown.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found a failure to comply with the duty to consult under section 188 TULRCA 1992 and ordered a protective award under section 189(2) TULRCA. The extracted text does not state the monetary amount of the award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.189(2) TULRCA 1992
- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.