Case 4102640/2019 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102640/2019 Mr R McMillan v Represented by: Ms J Merchant- Solicitor The Scottish Ministers — 2019
- Case reference
- 4102640/2019
- Decision date
- 12 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McFatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102640/2019 Mr R McMillan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R McMillan brought a tribunal claim against The Scottish Ministers. The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant.
The Employment Judge, Ian McFatridge, therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment are recorded in the extracted text.
The available listing identifies the case category as unfair dismissal, but the judgment itself only records withdrawal and dismissal under Rule 52. No panel members are listed, and the decision is dated 12 June 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the 2013 Rules. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.