Case 4102647/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102647/2020 Mrs L Cannon v Clerwood Kitchens & Bathrooms Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4102647/2020
- Decision date
- 3 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4102647/2020 Mrs L Cannon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent presented no response to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that Clerwood Kitchens & Bathrooms Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs L Cannon's wages and ordered payment of £9,493.
The tribunal also found that the respondent failed to furnish the claimant with a written statement of particulars of employment as required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Because the claimant succeeded in a claim of a kind mentioned in Schedule 5 of the Employment Act 2002, and the respondent had failed to issue written particulars, the tribunal awarded four weeks' pay in the sum of £873.60.
The judgment records no separate apportionment of the awards beyond those two sums. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment is £10,366.60.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £9,493 |
| Other | The judgment records a failure to furnish written particulars of employment under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awards four weeks' pay because the claimant succeeded in a claim of a kind mentioned in Schedule 5 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £874 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,367
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.